Firstly, not only does it group together a large and diverse amount of people, but the purposes in which social justice people use it is to group their warped concept of privilege into two forms; white and non-white. This is simply not the case. I, for one, would contend that historically blacks have had a much harder time than say…asians. Furthermore, you cannot classify the discrimination of latinos in with blacks, as blacks were forced to come to America by slavery, whilst latinos voluntarily immigrated there (except for spanish-descended colonists). Therefore it is ridiculous to think that you can group and class all these people into one category.
Secondly, it is used as a front to hate on white people. White people in the social justice world have been relegated to a devilish underclass whilst ‘people of color/colour’ are treated as godly beings. If you are going to be honest about it and be hateful and class whites as a separate, evil group, then lets just use non-White, and stop trying to dupe any of the more simple-minded folk. In a way, the term ‘people of color/colour’ is used in just the same way as the Germans used the term ‘aryan’ in Nazi Germany. Both of the terms are incorrect and class a vastly different group of people into one, and generally a despised minority into another; in the German’s case, the Jews and in the social justice brigade’s case, white people. That is why I despise the term ‘people of color/colour’, because it really is only used to alienate white people, something social justice twats are famous for.
Yup, the whole use and purpose of the term was to alienate and hate on white people. That’s exactly what people like Martin Luther King Jr. did and still do when they use any variation of the term…to alienate white people…